Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:42:45 -0800 (PST)
From:      William Woods <wwoods@cybcon.com>
To:        "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>
Cc:        freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Alphaststion 200 4/233...
Message-ID:  <XFMail.991112174245.wwoods@cybcon.com>
In-Reply-To: <19991112174132.B90421@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok, and the reasons for useing current over stable are ?

On 13-Nov-99 David O'Brien wrote:
>> What is the reccomended version for the best functionality of a DEC
>> Alphastation 200 4/233, 3.0-Stable or 4.0-Current? This is not a production
>> system by any means...
> 
> 4.0-CURRENT by all means.
> 
> -- 
> -- David    (obrien@NUXI.com)
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message


----------------------------------
E-Mail: William Woods <wwoods@cybcon.com>
Date: 12-Nov-99
Time: 17:42:19
FreeBSD 3.3 -Stable
----------------------------------


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.991112174245.wwoods>