From owner-freebsd-alpha Fri Nov 12 17:44:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mail.cybcon.com (mail.cybcon.com [216.190.188.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1024A150AE for ; Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:44:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wwoods@cybcon.com) Received: from freebsd.cybcon.com (william@pm3a-19.cybcon.com [205.147.75.148]) by mail.cybcon.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id RAA16515; Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:44:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3.1 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19991112174132.B90421@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:42:45 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: wwoods@cybcon.com From: William Woods To: "David O'Brien" Subject: Re: Alphaststion 200 4/233... Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ok, and the reasons for useing current over stable are ? On 13-Nov-99 David O'Brien wrote: >> What is the reccomended version for the best functionality of a DEC >> Alphastation 200 4/233, 3.0-Stable or 4.0-Current? This is not a production >> system by any means... > > 4.0-CURRENT by all means. > > -- > -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message ---------------------------------- E-Mail: William Woods Date: 12-Nov-99 Time: 17:42:19 FreeBSD 3.3 -Stable ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message