From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 00:37:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFB01065680; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584428FC15; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p9P0b4cs085206 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:37:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p9P0b4tJ085205; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:37:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA20228; Mon, 24 Oct 11 17:31:22 PDT Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:30:06 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: llwang@infor.org Message-Id: <4ea6657e.2VBpjdwl/pfQOFcl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4ea55387.DnwwF+hvqjtumYN4%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:35:05 +0000 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 32-bit binaries (e.g. wine) and 64-bit kernel structures X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:37:05 -0000 "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" wrote: > a lot of things (e.g. certain devices in the devfs) > are not available in the jail. I have gotten the impression that there's a way to fix that -- it involves something along the lines of a nullfs mount IIRC -- but I'm by no means an expert on jails. > ... I do believe the 64-bit kernel returns 64-bit > structures even in 32-bit jails. That is arguably a bug in the jail support :(