Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:24:34 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, lehmann@ans-netz.de Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/xcdroast Makefile pkg-plist ports/sysutils/xcdroast/files patch-Makefile Message-ID: <200108212024.f7LKOYm12559@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20010821221705.A860@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> References: <200108211950.f7LJo2B13278@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010821221705.A860@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_-1037373828P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake Alexander Langer (alex@FreeBSD.org): > > > sysutils/xcdroast Makefile pkg-plist > > sysutils/xcdroast/files patch-Makefile > > Log: > > More fixes: > > ... all submitted by MAINTAINER. I was going to ask about that..... > > - chown root:cdwrite various utilities used by xcdroast, such as > > cdrecord, and set them chmod 4710. I don't know if I like this. > > Opinions (Security Officer?)? > > What about this? I'm not the SO, but I know I don't like it. This means the xcdroast port is doing chown/chmod on files that were installed by *other* ports. To my knowledge, no other port does this and (as a user of cdrecord) I can't see any reason for making this change. Maybe the MAINTAINER (CC-ed) could give the reasoning for this? Cheers, Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1037373828P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD8DBQE7gsOC2MoxcVugUsMRAls3AKDzqYr4FmpWinXc97FicRGYAmoOBwCggiV3 e0Y9oiUx4BsjxecnR7CKD9g= =X2Rb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1037373828P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108212024.f7LKOYm12559>