Date: 27 Nov 2002 11:50:22 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Tim J. Robbins" <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netsmb smb_trantcp.c Message-ID: <1038360022.9582.13.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021126190200.10316A-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021126190200.10316A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 10:32, Robert Watson wrote: > Tim, thanks for working on this! Do we know what shape we're in now WRT > smbfs stability and functionality generally? Can I check off smbfs > entirely in our TODO list, or is this just a piece of the picture? AFAIK smbfs still (at least in stable) requires you to umount a given mount point 3-5 times before it will unmount (gives EBUSY before then). Also any attempt at umount -f causes a panic. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1038360022.9582.13.camel>