Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:54:06 -0600
From:      Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
To:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Raspberry Pi
Message-ID:  <4F59004E.5090401@tundraware.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120308184628.GB8035@hemlock.hydra>
References:  <20120307204923.GA19514@hemlock.hydra> <BAY165-ds72BD008F3EF7BF61F62D8CA560@phx.gbl> <20120307214008.GA25783@hemlock.hydra> <4F5872F7.6040908@qeng-ho.org> <20120308184628.GB8035@hemlock.hydra>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 03/08/2012 12:46 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 08:51:03AM +0000, Arthur Chance wrote:
>> On 03/07/12 21:40, Chad Perrin wrote:
>>>
>>> If anyone has more information about planned BSD Unix ports to Raspberry
>>> Pi, or comes up with more in the next few weeks, I'd appreciate it if
>>> someone would let me know (perhaps with URIs or contact information for
>>> people and projects working on this).
>>
>> There was a discussion about it over on hackers@ last November. The
>> thread starts at
>>
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-November/036742.html
>>
>> TL;DR summary: some are wildly in favour of it, others are
>> completely negative. I.e. the usual network response to anything :-}
>
> I'm curious about the reasoning for the negative.  I'll have to go skim
> that thread.  Thanks for pointing it out to me.
>

The complaints seemed to center around a lack of docs, but I don't
think this is still relevant.   The fact that several Linux variants
are ported suggests plenty of available doc.  Also, there is a detailed
doc on the Broadcom chip on the RP website.

Now, if we could just actuall GET the silly things it would be nice :)



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F59004E.5090401>