Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:18:30 +0200 From: Eduardo Morras <nec556@retena.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze? Message-ID: <4FA8828001255B27@> (added by postmaster@resmaa14.ono.com) In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207171124550.26877@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.p l> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF4BEED.10103@FreeBSD.org> <62039A45-92E4-4588-988D-6DF39D7B01E5@bsdimp.com> <201207050922.25815.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <20120705082857.GB37083@server.rulingia.com> <4FF55864.8040807@FreeBSD.org> <4FF5BE93.4010509@my.gd> <20120705170944.GA43725@DataIX.net> <20120705131518.06898223@bhuda.mired.org> <4FA882720124B385@> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207171124550.26877@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:25 17/07/2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>>the behavior of shells is an even worse idea than turning this nanny >>>behavior on for everyone. >> >>Add sysctl for apps is a no-no, sysctl is for system control, not userland > >still this stupid idea topics continue? Is FreeBSD finally intended >to be unix implementation or feature war with linux/windows? Of course it continues. There must be one site for each thing, that way i (we) only search where it is and not where perhaps it should be. I suppouse that you want sendmail configuration on sysctl? Not all, only some config lines, other lines can be on rc.conf, sendmail.conf, maild.conf and 30 more conf files. It's better than having only one. There will be conflicts, changes between minor release of where is what, but, hey!! it's the way you want it. >STOP IT. NO. And i can write with bigger uppercase letters than you ;) L
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FA8828001255B27>