Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 20:42:06 +0200 From: Thomas Quinot <thomas@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Guillaume <amyfoub@videotron.ca> Cc: Bryan Liesner <bleez@comcast.net> Subject: Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM) Message-ID: <20030924184206.GA43920@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <1063936446.811.11.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> References: <1062861719.2761.35.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <20030916132228.GG52463@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <1063763321.776.2.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <20030917091350.GA59292@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <20030917070959.L458@gravy.homeunix.net> <20030917114036.GA72243@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <1063847031.804.4.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <20030918193255.GB76387@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <1063936446.811.11.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 2003-09-19, Guillaume écrivait :
> Thanks for the patch. cd0 is faster now and ATAPICAM works great.
> Are you going to commit the patch?
DMA is now enabled for ATAPI/CAM i/o, as of atapi-cam.c rev. 1.26.
Thanks to all who tested and reviewed the change.
Thomas.
--
Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030924184206.GA43920>