From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Mar 28 19:20:12 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C775AB487 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Received: from mx.blih.net (mx.blih.net [212.83.155.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx.blih.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F7lsS0xfQz3G55 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bidouilliste.com; s=mx; t=1616959209; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bEiF4Mprw1YV8ll8kSLkE8YVjBxXCH9SdxWjMimh6Ig=; b=l+WEB5kvX4Akgr65UMSKPQ5JYNTrga5AMlmeiiAUReca6gykRU0YZ1ZEqnlL/IuHUELZ65 sgLBs3xcO3KC3UoNFa26QRbZ2652qdRPduTbbmnSAk+1rqgqvlQp6zRd7TtnRTMJWWQ3VE kM7BNEEGeN0JHkDO9+Br1bROynfeQik= Received: from amy (lfbn-idf2-1-644-4.w86-247.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.247.100.4]) by mx.blih.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f4ed40e7 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 21:20:09 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot To: Stefan Parvu Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any good alternative to Raspberry for Arm64? Message-Id: <20210328212009.1b6b3ad98f26256a3490b063@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <4F30ABFD-66D2-4515-A3BB-F13F767F8FB9@kronometrix.org> References: <7b284f7718556f1cf0a7a205c98db6b1@pyret.net> <8F8F3491-3E1F-45C8-BF61-09F7557F48A5@googlemail.com> <4F30ABFD-66D2-4515-A3BB-F13F767F8FB9@kronometrix.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4F7lsS0xfQz3G55 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bidouilliste.com header.s=mx header.b=l+WEB5kv; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=bidouilliste.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of manu@bidouilliste.com designates 212.83.155.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=manu@bidouilliste.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bidouilliste.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[bidouilliste.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[212.83.155.74:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12876, ipnet:212.83.128.0/19, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bidouilliste.com:s=mx]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[manu]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[212.83.155.74:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:20:12 -0000 On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 22:12:47 +0300 Stefan Parvu wrote: >=20 > > `have otherRK3399 with M.2-slot(Rock960(no more available on the market= ) while direct nvme -connection-support by=20 > > u-boot&FreeBSD is quite complicate , to say it kindly( Rock960 boots f= rom nvme but hangs @ mountroot> (nvme, nda, nvd seem to have problems) . By= the way, I doubt that RK3399 is faster than RPI4(tested by build world). > > powerd doesn?t scale correctly with RK3399 to 1800 for the big of big.L= ITTLE , so it?s to set manually?.. >=20 > So to summarize: >=20 > these are the SBC supported by FreeBSD: https://wiki.freebsd.org/arm64#Si= ngle_Boards >=20 > I agree part with Ian, RBPI is a mixed bag. Many things are not working (= Wifi, BLE) but for our product RBPI 3B/3B+ has been working without a probl= em outdoor and indoors. >=20 > Is there any hope to see Wifi / BLE working on this board RBPI 3B/4B ? >=20 > Are there any other SBC supported by FreeBSD 13/CURRENT ? A lot, you can consider any Allwinner H5/A64 and RockChip RK3328/RK3399 as supported. Some even have some dedicated image. > Are there any other ARM64 industrial boards (1/2/4GB RAM, RTC, -40C - 80C= ) supported by FreeBSD ? You might want to look at IMX8 boards. Allwinner, RockChip and RPI aren't made for industrial grade. > Is NetBSD a better choice than FreeBSD for ARM64 SBC ?=20 Better choice for what ? > Thanks, > Stefan >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 Emmanuel Vadot