From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 30 07:14:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B65516A4CE; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:14:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (mail.dt.e-technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.163.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1664C43D46; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:14:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org (krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.1])3E75B323A4; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:14:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68FBC3792; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:14:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from merlin.emma.line.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (m2a2.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08479-03; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:14:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5EE9CC3791; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:14:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:14:05 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20040630071405.GC8257@merlin.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Linimon , fox@vader.aacc.cc.md.us, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org References: <200406300600.i5U6002X091770@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406300600.i5U6002X091770@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at m2a2.dyndns.org cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: matthias.andree@gmx.de cc: fox@vader.aacc.cc.md.us Subject: Re: ports/68450: [patch] ports/database/db[234]/pkg-descr spelling and grammar nits X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:14:25 -0000 I'm sanctioning the changes as such but not the way they have taken into the CVS. 1. to the submitter, fox@: PRs should be Cc:d to the port maintainer 2. to the committer, Mark: The changes were neither important nor urgent, so there was no reason for the committer to go ahead and commit without asking feedback first. Please let's stick to the regular "maintainer gives his OK, committer reviews and only then commits" principle that is one of the building blocks of the quality of the build system. I'll agree to commits and possibly fix them up later when they address an issue that is both urgent and important. This certainly wasn't. -- Matthias Andree Encrypted mail welcome: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 (PGP/MIME preferred)