Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:24:22 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, absinthe@pobox.com, shanon loveridge <shanon_loveridge@yahoo.co.uk>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jdk1.3.1p5 Message-ID: <15382.20310.915394.242516@caddis.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <20011211103039.GA8233@gnuppy> References: <20011210001702.10731.qmail@web14303.mail.yahoo.com> <20011210024138.GA3148@gnuppy> <20011209223635.A1152@absinthe> <15380.15272.167683.46148@caddis.yogotech.com> <20011211103039.GA8233@gnuppy>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Why? The native threading that we're using now is no better/worse than > > the internal green threads implementation. Without kernel threads, > > native threads have *EXACTLY* the same sorts of problems that exist with > > green threads. > > It's not native threading per se as much as HotSpot. See my later email. > The port can't be > taken seriously until that is fully working, so what's being said isn't > a directly about native threading. I disagree, but we're all entitled to our own opinions. We don't need HotSpot in order to be 'real'. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15382.20310.915394.242516>