Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:26:33 -0500 From: "Bill Moran" <billm@craftmfg.com> To: "Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>, <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Overall "feel" for the stability of FreeBSD 5 Message-ID: <001001c2fa0e$8dca5990$613818ac@craftmfg.com> References: <002901c2f9f5$e909c2f0$613818ac@craftmfg.com> <003b01c2fa01$257ac7b0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> > From: "Bill Moran" <billm@craftmfg.com> > > I'm considering setting up a FreeBSD 5 machine as a dedicated > > backup/archive computer on a network I administer. > > > > I'm curious to hear some opinions on how wise this is. I know > > that 5 is still in a -CURRENT status and I've seen (and repeated) > > the warnings that it's not really production quality yet. > > > > So I'm curious as to a number of facets of its capibilities: > > 1) With the current developmet effort ... does it seem like 5.1 > > will be -STABLE ... or do folks feel that a -STABLE brand > > is further off (5.2?) > > 2) For a dedicated backup server, that can tolerate the > > performance problems that folks have been reporting, and > > won't upset the entire office if it panics on occasion, is 5 > > good enough at this point? > > > > I know this is inviting a lot of opinion and conjecture ... but I need > > some idea of where I can go with this. These folks need a solution > > soon, and I don't want to pass on something that's not ready yet. > > On the flip side, the nature of the beast means that it doesn't NEED > > to be a reliable as I normally expect a FreeBSD server to be, so > > there's a little more tolerance than usual. > > > > Any input is greatly appreciated. > > What's wrong with 4.8-RELEASE? Doesn't support DVD burning. Sorry ... forgot to specify my reasons ;)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001001c2fa0e$8dca5990$613818ac>