From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 09:30:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822F416A4CE; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:30:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.macomnet.ru (relay.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96EEB43D41; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:30:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (pm69ft3t@mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) by relay.macomnet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5M9Tqu517334944; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:29:52 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:29:52 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040622132451.K6489@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <40D754D5.1070805@freebsd.org> <20040622115532.W5744@mp2.macomnet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Andre Oppermann Subject: Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:30:09 -0000 On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, 11:23+0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Maxim Konovalov writes: > > In fact, our real world tests shown the current -CURRENT comparing to > > RELENG_5_2 is in a very bad shape. > > You'll have to substantiate that. All *my* real world tests show that > -CURRENT is a lot more stable and functional than RELENG_5_2. Yesterday -CURRENT leaks kernel memory very quickly and panics after 10 - 15 mins up. Machine is 2x3GHz Xeon, 4GB RAM, ~5000 httpd/ftpd tcp sessions, 300-400Mbps output, ~50TB output in a day. The same config (kernel, sysctl's, loader tunables, hardware) works well with RELENG_5_2. -- Maxim Konovalov