Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:52:02 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... Message-ID: <102131932.20050217185202@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <dcb2c27a05021703471ef8a72d@mail.gmail.com> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641B03@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <42130481.8000406@nbritton.org> <17410148610.20050216181649@wanadoo.fr> <dcb2c27a05021703471ef8a72d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sander Vesik writes: > Whats wrong with MySQL is that the kinds of databases you can and > really want to run with it are a rather limited set. If what you need > is covered by MySQL, sure nothing is wrong with it but it by far > doesn't cover everything. The same argument can be made with respect to FreeBSD on the desktop. Coincidence? -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?102131932.20050217185202>