From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 7 15:22:21 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA11241 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 15:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA11236 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 15:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA23657; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 15:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199706072222.PAA23657@implode.root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Bob Willcox cc: hackers mailing list Subject: Re: Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 LAN adapters? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Jun 1997 14:45:56 CDT." <19970607144556.23347@luke.pmr.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Sat, 07 Jun 1997 15:22:49 -0700 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Well, I now have part of my network running at 100mbps, but now I >have another problem. It has to do with some (older?) Intel >EtherExpress PRO/100 LAN adapters that I have gotten (surplus, for >a good price). Are these in some way different from the Intel >EtherExpress PRO/100B adapters that are mentioned in the handbook >under Ethernet cards? The reason I ask is that my system doesn't >notice these cards when I boot. Are these, perhaps, older and >non-supported adapters? The old, big, Pro/100 cards are an entirely different animal and stand no chance of working with the fxp driver. We have no support for those in FreeBSD. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project