From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 6 01:02:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF9716A4CE; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 01:02:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm29.prodigy.net (ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3898C43D45; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 01:02:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-72-244.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.72.244]) i6612RCZ021486; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 21:02:27 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 09E1F54948; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 18:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 18:02:29 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: "David O'Brien" Message-ID: <20040706010229.GA15009@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200407030941.i639fwt8078389@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040704032139.GA93138@VARK.homeunix.com> <20040704051607.GA78676@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040704205648.GA1617@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040704232050.GA90994@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040705194829.GA3743@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040705194829.GA3743@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/examples/etc make.conf X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 01:02:31 -0000 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 12:48:29PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > We care about not introducing instability into our packages? > >=20 > > If we have >=3D2 -O2 bugs in our source tree alone, why should you think > > that none of the 11000 ports are affected? >=20 > Because most everything in the ports collection was developed on Linux > using -O2. The bugs are in our code, not gcc's -O2. Even if that were true, most !=3D all. Kris --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA6folWry0BWjoQKURAlqFAKCL2AksBac9J1x/PGrlhyOhxuhqcgCfV5yZ k22CpKnBe3sBwD+G3gd/Lvc= =vUCZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--