Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 16:15:21 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, dfr@FreeBSD.ORG, dfr@nlsystems.com Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.kern.mk src/sys/alpha/conf Makefile.alpha Message-ID: <19981218161521.J93539@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <199812180732.SAA30830@godzilla.zeta.org.au>; from Bruce Evans on Fri, Dec 18, 1998 at 06:32:12PM %2B1100 References: <199812180732.SAA30830@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 18, 1998 at 06:32:12PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > >Anyone building alpha kernels should make sure to install bsd.kern.mk > >before trying to build another one. > > This should not be necessary. Makefile.alpha should use the relative > bsd.kern.mk like Makefile.i386. > > Makefile.alpha has rotted in several other ways since it was cloned > from Makefile.i386. These Makefiles are mostly machine-independent, > so they should be reorganized. I suggest the following reorganization: > > most of Makefile.alpha -> src/sys/conf/Makefile.kern > most of Makefile.i386 -> src/sys/conf/Makefile.kern > bsd.kern.mk -> src/sys/conf/bsd.kern.mk > bsd.kmod.mk -> src/sys/conf/bsd.kmod.mk > rules in sys/conf/files -> src/sys/conf/Makefile.inc > src/lkm -> src/sys/lkm (like src/sys/modules) I like this, except that I'm not quite certain the rule movement work out easily (but as long as I don't have to do the work, I'm all for it :-) Eivind, who would like a full re-org of the entire kernel source layout at some point. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981218161521.J93539>