From owner-freebsd-alpha Thu Dec 31 11:39:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA09976 for freebsd-alpha-outgoing; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 11:39:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles121.castles.com [208.214.165.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA09968; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 11:38:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA01178; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 11:35:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199812311935.LAA01178@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Narvi cc: Brian Handy , asami@FreeBSD.ORG, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alpha ports collection? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 31 Dec 1998 11:42:42 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 11:35:57 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > IMHO there should also be the NO_ALPHA (in general, NO_XXXX) which means > that the port is not applicapble to XXXX. After all, it is probable that > in some time there will be some ports specific to alpha, in which case > they would be marked NO_I386. This is logically inverted; the ONLY_FOR_ARCHS variable is the right way to go. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message