From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 18 19:20:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 6403110656CB; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:20:29 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20100818192029.GE43513@FreeBSD.org> References: <201008171005.o7HA5w7r003412@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100818185000.GB43513@FreeBSD.org> <1282158915.1724.11.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1282158915.1724.11.camel@hood.oook.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Martin Wilke Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT access approvecheck approvers avail cfg.pm cfg_local.pm checkoutlist commit_prep.pl commitcheck commitinfo config cvs_acls.pl cvsignore cvswrappers edithook editinfo exclude log_accum.pl logcheck loginfo modules notify options rcsinfo ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:20:29 -0000 On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:15:15PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Alexey Dokuchaev p??e v st 18. 08. 2010 v 18:50 +0000: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:05:58AM +0000, Martin Wilke wrote: > > > miwi 2010-08-17 10:05:58 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > . access approvecheck approvers avail > > > cfg.pm cfg_local.pm checkoutlist > > > commit_prep.pl commitcheck commitinfo > > > config cvs_acls.pl cvsignore cvswrappers > > > edithook editinfo exclude log_accum.pl > > > logcheck loginfo modules notify options > > > rcsinfo rcstemplate tagcheck taginfo > > > unwrap verifymsg verifymsgcheck wrap > > > Log: > > > - Forced commit to note kmoore@ is ready to fly solo, good lucky Kris! > > > > Ehm. Care to explain what had happened here? > > Ain't it obvious? Forced commit without specifying access explicitly. I guess I forgot the "irony" tag. The point is that usually people would followup to say that something like this was an accident. Otherwise some clueless committers might think this is normal way of doing things like that. ./danfe