From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 13:40:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972CA106566B for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.wilcox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E488FC1C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so1424985gwb.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:40:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lAqJdmLdAZraJIJ4lO/knR/H6ComEDlE+h4hz5XFIO0=; b=l0vJI4iufmTSiZf7i7z44kIhnoxs3ncNMKl/g2TiC2XXoYvwoySfUTCSXp7gRecPED OSBvY/R9wWfaINsyrRZgxDg3bHAGNEKTHjq0RhxDikk7exfLXMDe9gJsL0+qtD1P+PEk f8fmBVpscMkKIeO9ZoQKVuPYc4f7jAYS4fuH4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=DDqybQw9y24kinUptYU6gjIZpm+hNM8pRK1AGEV/h/aimheggc8o01wUlgE/nWrjcr EXG1GqJGjdfJOxnjtp/yIaAVrMo3opiTU/mDnYkcvDZ7mNY6M4t5e1WeiRuQvlEVPU/1 QJcdlllqAvO6uPZaxw7uFbxcCvjGjwbzV+/es= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.63.14 with SMTP id l14mr1430400aga.187.1285940456873; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.10.19 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 06:40:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:40:56 -0400 Message-ID: From: Kevin Wilcox To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: router / firewall with PF and carp. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:40:59 -0000 On 1 October 2010 05:29, krad wrote: > In my experiance freebsd should work fine. However I would say openbsd is > probably better suited to your needs, due to its tighter security model > (auditing) Krad, I was under the impression that 'audit' from TrustedBSD is built into FreeBSD. Is there a facility in OpenBSD that is "better" or is there something in 'audit' that is lacking? Thanks! kmw