Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:14:06 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/led Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/editors/led/files patch-Makefile.in Message-ID: <20010607071406.Y81224@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <200106070926.f579QqU16744@freefall.freebsd.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:26:52AM -0700 References: <200106070926.f579QqU16744@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--SvF6CGw9fzJC4Rcx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:26:52AM -0700, Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.or= g) wrote: > Added files: > editors/led/files patch-Makefile.in=20 > Log: > - Pass over maintainership to Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net> - h= e is > author of the led, so would be a best MAINTAINER for it; Adding patches when the author could easily integrate them into his source tree and roll a release at some point is bad form. Personally, I'd like to see it made a rule that whenever reasonably possible, people must get patches merged into the upstream before a commit is made, rather than after, with some obvious exceptions (e.g. FreeBSD release close by, author(s) have shown ignorance in the past, or high demand for patch etc.). --=20 wca --SvF6CGw9fzJC4Rcx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7H3AOF47idPgWcsURAvJ0AJ9xxTkikdLyMBpRLpc332bbMnroyQCdG4DB eO6M/gM+b4VMUOSO5FfYCHU= =kZ0L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SvF6CGw9fzJC4Rcx-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010607071406.Y81224>