From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 18:19:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D2716A4CE; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:19:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net (mtaw4.prodigy.net [64.164.98.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27AF43D2F; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:19:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (b2332fe8df8dcbe5fa20c83d4d87389b@adsl-67-119-53-203.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.203]) by mtaw4.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1P2Jcll028035; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:19:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C9F4066CAF; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:19:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:19:38 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Brad Knowles Message-ID: <20040225021938.GA60991@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <16443.35905.455147.330275@canoe.dclg.ca> <16443.39996.156614.885761@canoe.dclg.ca> <200402242318.20080.freebsd-current@webteckies.org> <403BE11A.2070609@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ENOUGH! [Re: Nontrivial brokeness with new threads.] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 02:19:40 -0000 --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:08:10AM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 4:41 PM -0700 2004/02/24, Scott Long wrote: >=20 > > Please be more respectful to people asking these kinds of questions. >=20 > The problem here is that Daniel's initial response to David's=20 > question was fine, but David's reply was snide and=20 > passive-aggressive. Daniel responding in kind is not unexpected.=20 > David should have fully read the threads that he was referring to,=20 > and not been so flippant in the first place. Who cares, let's all just shut up and code :) Kris --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAPAY6Wry0BWjoQKURAkYKAJ0XqyI/FQh+XQP5/ubBZI0nne04PACgtkBD w2wa+f5VKec2SUDT6ze+Luw= =d+JF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--