From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 16:13:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110DA37B404; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA78243F3F; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:13:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org (12-232-168-4.client.attbi.com[12.232.168.4]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with ESMTP id <2003041023135400100ohj48e>; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:13:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA91979; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:13:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:13:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Jeff Roberson In-Reply-To: <20030410162943.T37530-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Julian Elischer cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: John Baldwin Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/ddb db_ps.c src/sys/i386/i386 genassym.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:13:57 -0000 On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > There is NO support for locking a KSE to a CPU yet. That is a completely > > > > different question. > > > > > > > > > There is in ULE. > > > > But you keep your own information on this.. > > Yes, I'm telling you, if you add anything make it specific to the > scheduler. It doesn't not need to be in scheduler independant code. We > just need a new system call for binding a kse to a cpu. This will be > scheduler independant and then we can call a scheduler dependant routine > like sched_bind(kse, cpu); exactly my thought. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > information in the scheduler specific data. I already have an entry for > > > > > > it in ULE. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >