From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 17 09:19:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A8116A4CE; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:19:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 62-15-215-140.inversas.jazztel.es (62-15-215-140.inversas.jazztel.es [62.15.215.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D762443D64; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:19:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) j2H9JB1Z016339; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:19:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@redesjm.local) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by redesjm.local (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j2H9JUdU000748; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:19:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@redesjm.local) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: "Jeremy Messenger" Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:19:29 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200503170242.25222.freebsd@redesjm.local> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503171019.29957.freebsd@redesjm.local> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.30.0.7; VDF: 6.30.0.31; host: antares.redesjm.local) cc: gnome@freebsd.org cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Jose M Rodriguez Subject: Re: libgnomevfs2 (2.10) and KDE apps X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:19:25 -0000 El Jueves, 17 de Marzo de 2005 05:56, Jeremy Messenger escribi=F3: > On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 02:42:24 +0100, Jose M Rodriguez > > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > gnome-menus doesn't provide any option to enable/disable like what > gnomevfs2 used to have. I am not going to work on to break the > 'standard' installation of gnome-menus, so send us the patch if you > do really want to have the KDE menu disable. When you create patch, > be sure to keep KDE menu enable by default. > My problems are, in general, related to the presence=20 of /usr/local/share/ in some paths. I don't know of any gnome bits=20 under /usr/local/share. > > I think that, if a gnome user need a kde app (very rare case), he > > may use the same env to include /usr/local/share/ or what he needs > > of special. > > Disagree, this is even more nasty. If GNOME 2.10 has menu editors > then the things will be difference, because any users can remove KDE > menu. It is easier to remove than that 'env' stuff. > I think that gnome init do some scan on that paths and an auto config,=20 but you may know more than I about that. The env thing has solved my=20 problems now. =2D- josemi > Cheers, > Mezz > > > Thanks in advance, > > -- > > josemi