Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:19:46 +0200 From: Ernst de Haan <ernst@jollem.com> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Shouldn't editors/jedit depend on java/jfc ? Message-ID: <20010516151946.A9383@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> In-Reply-To: <3B027A0E.BB3DDBD3@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, May 16, 2001 at 04:01:02PM %2B0300 References: <20010516144617.A9023@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> <3B027A0E.BB3DDBD3@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim,
> > I wonder why the editors/jedit port downloads a separate swingall.jar file.
> > Can't we make jedit depend on java/jfc instead ?
> The reason here is the size of jfc.
Okay, then how about this:
* Create a new port `java/jfc-bin' that just installs swingall.jar somewhere
under /usr/local/share/java/classes
* Make `java/jfc' depend on `java/jfc-bin' and not install a new swingall.jar
file
* Make `editors/jedit' depend on `java/jfc-bin'
Whaddayathink?
Ernst
--
Ernst de Haan
Java Architect
Jollem Information Technology
"Come to me all who are weary and burdened
and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010516151946.A9383>