From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov  3 12:25:32 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E02B16A420
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  3 Nov 2005 12:25:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from taras.savchuk@gmail.com)
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.199])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A659843D5C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu,  3 Nov 2005 12:25:29 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from taras.savchuk@gmail.com)
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t10so638966wxc
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 04:25:28 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
	b=jb+a8cWmmOeUKXFw90YH18SFjK8HgiYM/YgC0Pttx5x4z33dDS2ZNK/VqrzhETyWfgTgwzPFRXhIJnkxKukF+C6IlCroiEU23zjP1hhQ5f1WIFRsh3LZxYzVGPBxufJgk6TKeVtnJ9yvExESSPg7K8UGvAdyIUCcrw6haa+jZM0=
Received: by 10.65.147.10 with SMTP id z10mr617473qbn;
	Thu, 03 Nov 2005 04:25:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.160.16 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 04:25:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <84099c3d0511030425q3592a288he254cb5f97f976b6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 15:25:28 +0300
From: Taras Savchuk <taras.savchuk@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <84099c3d0511030325q6d1df92ag77310ff1b03a2d15@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <84099c3d0511030325q6d1df92ag77310ff1b03a2d15@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Subject: Re: May be a bug in fsck [ after super block crash on 5.4-STABLE ]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:25:32 -0000

On 11/3/05, Taras Savchuk <taras.savchuk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> My SATA HDD with UFS2 crashed. While checking HDD fsck said, that
> alternate super block at block 32 is not present. In 'man fsck' I saw, th=
at
> in UFS2 (my file system) alternate super block is usually located in bloc=
k
> 160 (For UFS1 - in 32). So the question is: why fsck trying to find
> alternate superblock in wrong block for UFS2? I can suppose, that fsck do=
nt
> know file system type (UFS1 or UFS2) while checking, but such assumption
> seems to be wrong.


PS: With '-b 160' option fsck done work well.