Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 13:13:31 -0500 From: Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! Message-ID: <20060910181331.GA35166@FS.denninger.net> In-Reply-To: <20060910151817.H8856@psg.com> References: <20060909182831.GA32004@FS.denninger.net> <200609100159.k8A1xAIn089481@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20060910150526.GA31323@FS.denninger.net> <20060910151817.H8856@psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 03:21:33PM +0000, Patrick J Okui wrote: > On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > > >Once the -RELEASE branch is taken, code updates there <STOP>. > > > > I take it you haven't read the text in the handbook that has been > linked to by a few posters. > > You can track changes to a particular release - say by using > RELENG_6_1 rather than RELENG_6. In which case, would you still > say you are tracking STABLE? Yes. If I track RELENG_6 (once 6.0-RELEASE has gone out) then I'm by definition tracking -STABLE. Indeed, the current tag on my CVS tree is TRELENG_6! -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060910181331.GA35166>