From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 18:45:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BDD106564A; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (server.infocus-llc.com [206.156.254.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADCE8FC0C; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-64-226-141.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.64.226.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 003EC37B444; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:28:52 -0600 (CST) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 67BA761C42; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:28:52 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:28:52 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Alexander Best Message-ID: <20101118182852.GR63683@over-yonder.net> References: <4CE50849.106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4CE52177.3020306@freebsd.org> <20101118182324.GA36312@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101118182324.GA36312@freebsd.org> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20-fullermd.4 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current , FreeBSD Stable , Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: TTY task group scheduling X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:45:33 -0000 On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM +0000 I heard the voice of Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus: > > judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo. Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is that Linux's interactive response when under heavy load was always much worse than FreeBSD's. So maybe that's just them catching up to where we already are ;) -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.