From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 20 3: 0:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-215.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07B537B401 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 03:00:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1AF4766C4D; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 03:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 03:00:49 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Sung Nae Cho Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does kernel option "CPU_FASTER_5X86_FPU" apply to Intel Celeron CPU's? Message-ID: <20010720030049.A83128@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from sucho2@quasar.phys.vt.edu on Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 02:03:17AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 02:03:17AM -0400, Sung Nae Cho wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Anyone here know if the kernel option in LINT, "CPU_FASTER_5X86_FPU" > applies to Celeron processors or if it only applies to 586 cpus as it's > name seem to suggest? It doesn't apply to Celerons. > Also, I've noticed that you can get the soundcard to work in FreeBSD by > loading the module at /boot/loader.conf. What's the advantage of > compiling the sound support in kernel (say, options pcm) instead of using > the module? If there isn't any advantages, I'd rather want to keep the > kernel size small and load the modules as necessary. The only real downside is that you have to keep your modules in sync with your kernel. If you use 'make buildkernel' as documented then there's no problem. > Lastly, if I'll be loading the USB modules from /boot/loader.conf, do I > still need to have the USB options compiled in the kernel or that's not > necessary? Not necessary (and if you have it compiled in, you can't load the module :) Kris --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7WAFQWry0BWjoQKURAkM4AKDHTVLSAFwRKGjqTkCaxF2ykt1ryQCfV8RV djLN7rviQicjbEDNKsj9vrQ= =tiQf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message