From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 14 04:52:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CDE16A400 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 04:52:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3096343D45 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 04:52:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k4E4qBx92487; Sat, 13 May 2006 21:52:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "David Stanford" Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:52:11 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 In-reply-to: Importance: Normal Cc: reflex@rotten.com, questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: New FreeBSD logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 04:52:19 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: David Stanford [mailto:dthomas53@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 8:11 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: reflex@rotten.com; questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD logo On 5/13/06, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >>Your missing something - "they" didn't ask all us users if we wanted >>a new logo or not. >I wasn't aware they had to (?). I wasn't aware we had to praise and thank them for something we didn't want. >my statement meant that I hoped the Project isn't swayed out of >using the logo because of childish posts such as these. They put the new logo in over lots of objections so I doubt that childish posts will make any difference. > I would love to hear how this, > among your *many* other posts, has contributed to this list. Sure, as soon as you say how your post chastising the people that think the new logo looks like a sex toy has made a contribution to the list. >>The community doesen't want the new logo and the majority of the >>community >>prefers Beastie over the sex-toy. >You speak for the community? The community has already spoken, go back and look at all the posts on this and the other lists on the logo, the majority of them don't like it. You probably should have done this research before posting. >Agreed, and this will be my last post on the subject Good, we don't need more posting on this topic from people who haven't bothered to read the overwhelming posts against the new logo. Ted