Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 04:19:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: "Christian S.J. Peron" <csjp@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw2.c Message-ID: <20040617041743.J5269@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <200406112217.i5BMHFfM064236@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200406112217.i5BMHFfM064236@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Christian S.J. Peron wrote: > Some very basic benchmarks were taken which compares the number > of in_pcblookup_hash(9) activations to the number of firewall > rules containing UID/GID based contraints before and after this patch. > > The results can be viewed here: > o http://people.freebsd.org/~csjp/ip_fw_pcb.png For future reference, you should write out a quick summary of the results in the commit message where possible. When some fresh new FreeBSD committer comes running through the ipfw code 2 years from now, it's likely that the url will be invalid, and the youngster will not be able to learn how much you improved the code. :) Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040617041743.J5269>