Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 07:10:31 -0800 (PST) From: Hiten Pandya <hitmaster2k@yahoo.com> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, "Brian T.Schellenberger" <bts@babbleon.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, BOUWSMA Beery <freebsd-user@netscum.dyndns.dk>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance of FreeBSD vs NetBSD (was: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable) Message-ID: <20020311151031.14799.qmail@web21108.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20020311064831.A42820@iguana.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> wrote: > As I already asked: > what compile time options were used in the two cases ? > They surely can make a huge difference. > > cheers > luigi > Could it also be a possibility, that the NetBSD defaults differ from the FreeBSD defaults, I think this could make some difference too. :) Regards, -- Hiten Pandya -- <hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020311151031.14799.qmail>