Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:33:08 +0100 From: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless) Message-ID: <20171207133307.GT19238@e.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <20171207131444.GA36791@c720-r314251> References: <CAGBxaXmwzXqZXSKX4-_qe15L3Xa8bVx%2BsFnFrxoksY8Ka3gS3w@mail.gmail.com> <865f71f7-5d2d-90fd-8b41-c00d2317d083@rlwinm.de> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712070916370.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> <04c3f524-b594-078b-f28c-597c4da595e8@rlwinm.de> <CAGwOe2aFg9yF%2B1tEgV1quDAsd1XV9fMNuzG_aFE6uiW=-7GU8w@mail.gmail.com> <indi-1zk3-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20171207131444.GA36791@c720-r314251>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:14:44PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Sometimes I want to add some port which was not built with poudriere > directly compiling it on the target laptops and now, ofc, this > compilation is missing some other packages the concrete port is > depending on and it tries to build them too, even if they are already as > built package in my local repo. If I'm not lazy, I watch the building > and when it goes to look in Internet for some additional source to > build, I interrupt the 'make install' and look if I could install it from > the local repo. Boring. Can I direct the make process to look on the > flight into the local repo to satisfy the needs of the compilation of > the port? You can in the port's directory you can run "pkg install -A `make missing`. That should install missing dependencies as packages. Sometimes there are no packages for a dependecy then you can skip those: "pkg install -A `make missing | grep -v -e fooport -e barport`
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171207133307.GT19238>