Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:00:58 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: Vizion <vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com>, linimon@lonesome.com Cc: neuhauser@sigpipe.cz, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports Message-ID: <20051022100058.a24c54d9.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200510211707.29223.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> References: <43522953.6050700@ebs.gr> <20051021223958.GA19955@soaustin.net> <20051021235950.GB15030@isis.sigpipe.cz> <200510211707.29223.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:07:27 -0700 Vizion <vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> wrote: > On Friday 21 October 2005 16:59, the author Roman Neuhauser contributed to > the dialogue on- > Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports: > ># linimon@lonesome.com / 2005-10-21 17:39:58 -0500: > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 03:19:47PM -0700, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > >> > Seems like the quantity of ports available will eventually hit a plateau > >> > with the current two level directory structure. No one is afraid to > >> > update the basic OS when its needed, even when it means using an entirly > >> > different file system ( ie. UFS1 -=> 2 ), why be so scared when it > >> > comes to the ports system? > Good point > I know my opinion might be regarded as ecentric but, as I see it, the > community is spending far too much od its developmental resopurces on > advancing the operating system and far too little on bringing user interfaces > and convenience up to date. > I see it as time to slow down on OS development and really focus on bringing > the operating system management to a level that accords with comparable > modern day standards. > >> Then PLEASE SUBMIT PATCHES. Tested ones. Involving portsmon. Involving > >> the build cluster. Involving marcusom tinderbox. Involving FreshPorts. > >> Involving everything in bsd.*.mk. Involving fixing up all the > >> dependencies after all the thousands of repocopies. > > > > This is an absurd overreaction. > Agreed - Hum.. The eclipse repocopy discussion became new ports system discussion. Next time, please implement ports2/eclipse or ports/eclise. So I'll repocopy from */eclipse-* to eclipse/, too. BTW as soon as possible;-), I'll send-pr my 2nd repocopy plan (java/eclipse -> editors/eclipse), and repocopy these.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051022100058.a24c54d9.nork>