From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 07:05:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8722916A41C for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 07:05:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351E343D1D for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 07:05:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id j4T75tb95244; Sun, 29 May 2005 00:05:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Ulf Magnusson" , Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 00:05:11 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: RE: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 07:05:15 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ulf Magnusson > Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 4:48 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Seagate HD not detected by FreeBSD > > > I'm trying to add a 120 GiB Seagate Barracuda (ST3120022A) HD. I've > attached it as the sole device on IDE cable 2, jumpering it as a slave > device. Wrong. Each IDE cable can have 2 devices a master and a slave. So if you have 2 IDE controllers you can have master, slave, master, slave for a total of 4 drives. It is not master on ide cable 1, slave on ide cable 2. >It is correctly detected by the BIOS as the Secondary Slave. Meaningless since BIOS routines do a lot of non-standard things and are not used for disk access in a protected mode OS. Ted