Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 07:43:04 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_K=F6ller?= <lars.koeller@uni-bielefeld.de> Cc: lars@koellers.net Subject: Re: single precision fftw wanted Message-ID: <413866D8.1020104@math.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <200409030732.i837WOw05534@rayadm.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de> References: <200409030732.i837WOw05534@rayadm.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lars Köller wrote: > ---------- > > In reply to Stephen Montgomery-Smith who wrote: > > >>Dear Lars and ports, >> >>I am interested in creating a port for gromacs (http://www.gromacs.org) >>and it requires fftw built using single precision. The super-easy way >>is to create a port sfftw which is a copy of fftw with a line like >>CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-float --enable-type-prefix >>added in. Or I could add some kind of option to fftw. Anyway, since >>Lars is the maintainer of fftw I would like to coordinate with him about >>it. And I am copying this to ports as well just in case anyone else has >>suggestions. > > > Hi, I'm just back from holidays. I think if we have the requirement of > a single precision of another port, it is the only solution to make a > separate port. > > However, are the libraries separated, so it is possible to have both > installed? > Yes - if one builds fftw correctly, the only common files between single precision and double precision will be the docs.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?413866D8.1020104>