Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:52:44 -0400 From: "Charles Swiger" <cswiger@mac.com> To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.6 rl0 and xl0 watchdog timeout problems (and solution) Message-ID: <000001c2453e$42dd1830$0301a8c0@prime> References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAAm0mmX4YL20Ge1GHljvj3wwEAAAAA@computer.org><1029448514.14968.76.camel@snowball.frostbytes.com> <00cd01c24526$8c6ea350$0301a8c0@prime> <1029505650.30127.2.camel@icehouse>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Jim Frost" <jimf@frostbytes.com> [ ... ] > Ahh, that's exactly what I was looking for. Thanks! You're welcome; pas de rien. > I don't really think that putting the canned configurations in "custom" > is the right thing to do (to me that's the opposite of "custom"), > but at least it's there. You may have a point there. :-) If the software is well-written, "default" asks you questions that anyone needs to think about, and "custom" asks questions that reflect the developer's expectations but not their preferences. Anyway, I've been a sysadmin long enough to know that the difference between the "default" and the "custom" install is always worth comparing. -Chuck PS: I think the local jargon translates the above to "/stand/sysinstall should follow the principle of least surprise". To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001c2453e$42dd1830$0301a8c0>