From owner-freebsd-atm  Sat Dec  7 10:15:16 1996
Return-Path: <owner-atm>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id KAA03104
          for atm-outgoing; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 10:15:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from george.lbl.gov (george-2.lbl.gov [131.243.2.12])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id KAA03099
          for <freebsd-atm@freebsd.org>; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 10:15:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: (jin@localhost) by george.lbl.gov (8.6.10/8.6.5) id KAA16217; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 10:15:13 -0800
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 10:15:13 -0800
From: "Jin Guojun[ITG]" <jin@george.lbl.gov>
Message-Id: <199612071815.KAA16217@george.lbl.gov>
To: pete@sms.fi
Subject: Re: ATM drivers
Cc: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-atm@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Jin Guojun[ITG writes:
> > 
> > If you have difficulty to get FreeBSD driver from Zeitnet support, you may
> > ask them for the permission to get the driver from me, and you can get an
> > adapter from them. (Do not ask them for the source code permission).
> > 
>I'm fully aware of that. I'd like to know if the driver for FreeBSD2.2
>will or is supporting LANE1.0? I've been looking for a card to put
>into powerful PC-based unix servers that would support LANE with
>SVC's. Linux does not count as powerful in my vocabulary.
>
>Pete

Absolutely. That is why it is a formal-commercial release. PVC, SVC, ILMI, and
SPAN are all supported. I think leave the PVC in the code will not reduce
the performance, and give some flexibility for some dummy networks (switches).

-Jin