From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 17 06:29:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C412D16A4CE for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 06:29:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca [142.179.111.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C5E43DB9 for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 06:29:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandy@krvarr.bc.ca) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4H6SthW051849; Mon, 16 May 2005 23:28:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca) Received: (from sandy@localhost) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j4H6Stfp051846; Mon, 16 May 2005 23:28:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandy) From: Sandy Rutherford MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17033.36647.195132.991488@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:28:55 -0700 To: Roland Smith In-Reply-To: <20050516215544.GA1693@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20050516212544.GA1539@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20050516215544.GA1693@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.3.1 X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster@krvarr.bc.ca for more information. X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact postmaster@krvarr.bc.ca for details. X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner-From: sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Florian Hengstberger Subject: Re: tetex, latex, dvips X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 06:29:06 -0000 >>>>> On Mon, 16 May 2005 23:55:44 +0200, >>>>> Roland Smith said: > LaTeX3 (if it is ever finished) will be integrated into the different > distributions. OTOH, even Leslie Lamport seems to think that LaTeX will > fall into disuse in about five years. The consensus seems to be that ConTeXt > is the most modern TeX macro package. I find this hard to believe. There is simply too much scientific publishing infrastructure invested into LaTeX for the AMS, APS, Springer-Verlag, and others to make the shift without a good reason. There are literally 100's of LaTeX compatible packages for specialised scientific typesetting (commutative diagrams, Feynman diagrams, etc) that would need to be rewritten. Sandy