Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:39:42 +0000
From:      Masoom Shaikh <masoom.shaikh@gmail.com>
To:        Iain Hibbert <plunky@rya-online.net>
Cc:        freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: remote_name_request, using libbluetooth
Message-ID:  <b10011eb0910040739w2e522bd5h7114214dffa68a6b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1254643032.101648.162.nullmailer@galant.ukfsn.org>
References:  <b10011eb0910030706i381052felb65318164195d80d@mail.gmail.com> <1254600808.002635.1652.nullmailer@galant.ukfsn.org> <b10011eb0910032156i1788fc71rf599bb251916006b@mail.gmail.com> <1254643032.101648.162.nullmailer@galant.ukfsn.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Iain Hibbert <plunky@rya-online.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Masoom Shaikh wrote:
>
> > > On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Masoom Shaikh wrote:
> > >
> > > >         int status = bt_devreq( s, &request, 0);
> >
> > yes, i did forgot to say where it failed, devices are inquired properly
> no
> > issues there
> > but bt_devreq() fails with status == -1
>
> ah, I see.. you should put a non-zero timeout value there (waiting for 0
> seconds will not leave enough time for the response :)
>
> if you use eg
>
>        if (status == -1)
>                err(1, "bt_devreq (RemoteNameRequest)")
>
> then you would see an "Operation timed out" message.. I should think 5
> seconds would be reasonable..
>
> regards,
> iain
>
>
> u got the bug by neck, and i would have slit its neck by the time this mail
is in your inbox ;-)
that was the exact error, timeout value of 5 didn't work for me, thus am
using 60, and it works
thanks Iain



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b10011eb0910040739w2e522bd5h7114214dffa68a6b>