From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 26 20:44:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972E5106566C for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from sirius.xvoid.org (sirius.xvoid.org [IPv6:2001:470:28:4ba:20c:29ff:fe62:9a22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E95C8FC0A for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sirius.xvoid.org (yuri@sirius.xvoid.org [IPv6:::1]) by sirius.xvoid.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0QKiQGK046014; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:44:26 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: (from yuri@localhost) by sirius.xvoid.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0QKiQl2046013; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:44:26 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: sirius.xvoid.org: yuri set sender to yuri.pankov@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:44:26 +0400 From: Yuri Pankov To: Jerry Message-ID: <20120126204426.GF1070@sirius.xvoid.org> References: <20120126074818.1ba6fd23@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120126074818.1ba6fd23@scorpio> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Old Bug or not? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:44:28 -0000 --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:48:18AM -0500, Jerry wrote: > There seems to be an old BUG, > http://osdir.com/ml/freebsd-bugs/2006-04/msg00309.html > that has recently been noted on the Postfix forums. 403 Forbidden > Was this "bug" ever actually addressed? In other words, is this an > actual bug or is it working as intended? If it is a bug, and since > it is apparently nearly 5 years old, will anyone actually ever look at > it? Yuri --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPIbsqAAoJEF9SuVmZPGsqRfoQAJpTaYJSze1UTFplTbp0dzQY mRPCmnFf3qn+z7DH7VAQCDveJuYUlS/ArbvXDNH/9bmBpYxZXnHrcvEbU2gg5Sim Vz3FpjBtd+M/xpQXZ9nzhH8v3sVeVX6VynoumE1+ktJcGEWHvzIstRI9qB5f5KUO iKIIykvX57j6uFb/KoBLuN2r+W3B6ueti5axAfoMhqdr48Ad5HuacvTzCTxqe0tw 1IcqQ9o1XMfGuLktytMNjY7KR7EaCjMjcwIV6yTGWN58LFWuzKU6zoiqSkz7ELm2 aHQplB9+uVb2tfAUFPt6hsubAE8si4q3QZRAtbax5I5lILS4dx+WdA8IVE0U0k5O kAzxCvkAkdpLmFME9rH40S2bHqmEEKTfu/axH4vn7/l39QUMED5SBnhXnfUgIlBM IzFh13N1FmtF4IUd/qmDJyEcoYABp8PZ2kRpj9NxJDLS+dH71ly6aSM1/eJ4OTgG CEjV0L9S8M16laZoeTb4ClCVIIPEXtdav3Hx+3Gdk11CoJVNtRa+N8IpmLl9zngU e8IH49x951OcEVdNTfKdNEH3FaqJ9SVl/3BYEinrCD7nrqHEgdzhhOpENJMQQLGx yaAjV8HQhXdm4j32k26y4VTlQA4068ESILX6/qrbNTkAkXsucArvIdNXo4T2Hdg1 V4KWvwS1y/G+lWbJ7dB7 =4oKL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt--