Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:41:50 -0400 From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: re@freebsd.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 Available... Message-ID: <CACqU3MWWJqvNLTg8MKtihbLNiF-P3cav34fwuR7-Ee3wtWc0wQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo839LACnDgNsVVtNs%2Bci6LgKkwdPLXDQbipKv1NVr2701dQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <1317260554.93406.33.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <CACqU3MX9%2B_R5tKd6LhobL8omgb23kUyGcSjiyrpgN36wh9oZWg@mail.gmail.com> <CACqU3MWbgdUV0tv4Op5J==CeiY2O12bAY4QP8VCn%2Bap_gG2Vxg@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo839x5dPY9yxsyQfJrxXn9SsEZLG3GZLhKmemRtfPzvKu8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo839LACnDgNsVVtNs%2Bci6LgKkwdPLXDQbipKv1NVr2701dQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 October 2011 16:35, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 4 Oct 2011 16:26, "Arnaud Lacombe" <lacombar@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wro= te: >>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu> wrot= e: >>>>> >>>>> The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now >>>>> available. =A0Since this is the first release of a brand new branch >>>>> I cross-post the announcements on both -current and -stable. =A0But >>>>> just so you know most of the developers active in head pay more >>>>> attention to the -current mailing list. =A0If you notice problems you >>>>> can report them through the normal Gnats PR system or on the -current >>>>> mailing list. >>>>> >>>>> The 9.0-RELEASE cycle will be tracked here: >>>>> >>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.0TODO >>>>> >>>> could you please update that page ? It's wayy out of date... >>>> >>> The page is immutable, so I guess a lambda user cannot edit it. >>> >>> Could you please give me the credential to update it ? >>> >>> Providing an out-of-date status update page in a release is really >>> amateurish; the only real use of that page being during the release >>> process... >>> >> What is your Wiki name? > > Just to clarify, I will fix you up with access, but the re page should > not be edited without re approval! > Not when re@'s guys are not doing their job. With privilege comes responsibility. - Arnaud
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACqU3MWWJqvNLTg8MKtihbLNiF-P3cav34fwuR7-Ee3wtWc0wQ>