Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:26:38 +0100
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk>
To:        Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net>
Cc:        Aurelien Nephtali <aurelien.nephtali@wanadoo.fr>
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Please test: new ACPI release (20041105) import
Message-ID:  <419B194E.5090800@DeepCore.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20041117081007.GC95090@laptop.6bone.nl>
References:  <20041115211636.GA1540@laptop.6bone.nl> <419AF4E7.5000206@wanadoo.fr> <20041117081007.GC95090@laptop.6bone.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Santcroos wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:51:19AM +0100, Aurelien Nephtali wrote:
>=20
>>The patch applies fine but it sill doesn't fix two long standing bugs :=
/
>=20
> At least there are no regressions, thats good news.
>=20
>>The first one is a resume problem, when I suspend my laptop with 'zzz' =

>>it works, but when I resume it the LCD stays black and that's all. I've=
=20
>>tested setting reset_video to 0 but it's the same.
>=20
> So it is only the display that doesn't come back? Is this in X or at th=
e=20
> console? Have you tried jhb's acpi_video patches that have the dpms pat=
ches
> included? (They are in the archive of this list)

The problem here has been known since mid august (3 months), I have 3=20
different laptops here that all fails in this manner (ASUS, Acer, IBM),=20
however they lockup solid on resume which might be why ;)

>>The secong bug is relatted to battery. Sometimes when I unplug the AC, =

>>the system catch it and ma battery % falls to 98% and stays stuck on=20
>>this value. It means no warning when battery is critical :/
>=20
> What happens if you plug the AC back after a while?

There are nasties in the bat stuff, I have to comment out various parts=20
of it to get the ASUS to boot at all :(

<soapbox>
This brings up the question: do we have a maintainer for ACPI and why=20
arent these issues being dealt with ? I for one have reported these=20
issue for ages including as much debug as is possible, but it seems to=20
be silently ignored (and yes 5.3-RELEASE is just as broken)...
</soapbox>

--=20

-S=F8ren




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?419B194E.5090800>