Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:59:42 +0200 From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flash10 vs f10; em(4) now broken in -current in qemu/vbox Message-ID: <20090610215942.GA34102@triton.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0906092239i2b04f3dcic5a593a308ef3849@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090606162235.GA49444@triton.kn-bremen.de> <2a41acea0906091104q17aeb174l8a34bf7464a80509@mail.gmail.com> <20090609195141.GA4982@triton.kn-bremen.de> <2a41acea0906091412k4fc58f4dt2c4ebbbb6dbd46dd@mail.gmail.com> <20090609220648.GA14714@triton.kn-bremen.de> <2a41acea0906092239i2b04f3dcic5a593a308ef3849@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 10:39:33PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. > > I know nothing about vbox, I had assumed it followed vmware in emulating the > 82545. So, can you not configure things so you always use the type with the > workaround? You can configure the emulated nic per VM, and there are three varieties of e1000 to choose from (in addition to two pcnet), only one of them now doesn't work. I'm not sure there's a configurable global default, the default seems to depend on the type of guest OS selected when creating the VM, and in fact now (with the patch) is a working e1000 variety when creating a FreeBSD VM. > I have no intention of adding workarounds to more hardware > types. So its not too big of a problem I'd say... :) Thanx, Juergen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090610215942.GA34102>