From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 21:08:32 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 7FEEF16A542; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D10F16A53F; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zec@icir.org) Received: from mail.srv.carnet.hr (unknown [IPv6:2001:b68:e160:0:211:43ff:fecd:6374]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEB913C4A7; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:08:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zec@icir.org) Received: from vipnet116-165.mobile.carnet.hr ([193.198.165.116]:51230) by mail.srv.carnet.hr with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ILmZu-0004SN-Eq; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:08:28 +0200 From: Marko Zec To: John Baldwin Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:08:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200707252320.l6PNKbjo098633@repoman.freebsd.org> <200708161431.16137.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200708161431.16137.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708162308.06387.zec@icir.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 193.198.165.116 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-26) on nihal.carnet.hr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham version=3.1.4 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) Cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 124103 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:08:32 -0000 On Thursday 16 August 2007 20:31, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 25 July 2007 07:20:37 pm Marko Zec wrote: > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=124103 > > > > Change 124103 by zec@zec_tca51 on 2007/07/25 23:20:21 > > > > Introduce a macro for checking whether a vnet is the default > > vnet (vnet_0) or not. This change will probably start making > > more sense once vnet_0 gets nuked (soon). > > Maybe call it 'IS_DEFAULT_VNET'? Sure, that makes perfect sense -> will do... Marko