Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:31:28 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/67893: [patch] boot(8)'s -m description is insufficient. Message-ID: <444576D0.5000603@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20060419014821.S73773@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <200604181900.k3IJ0rUC075126@freefall.freebsd.org> <44455CCF.7060106@FreeBSD.org> <1142977415.20060418234409@rulez.sk> <20060419014821.S73773@mp2.macomnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, 23:44+0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
>
>> Hello Doug,
>>
>> Tuesday, April 18, 2006, 11:40:31 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> My understanding is that when something is committed to HEAD, the
>>> state of the PR should be changed to patched, and then closed when
>>> the fix is MFC'ed, is that no longer the case, or is my
>>> understanding wrong?
>> I would say, that it's still the way you wrote, but I noticed that
>> not all commiters follow this rule :/
>>
>> (FYI i'm not commiter, so I might be wrong, although I recall reading
>> that somewhere, possibly on /internal/ pages.)
>
> Send a complain to core@ and they remove my commit bit from access ;-)
>
> Actually, I don't get it as a strict rule. I used to use "patched"
> state as an MFC reminder for the critical from my POV PRs. For all
> other I have different mechanism.
>
> And trust me, I don't forget to MFC this change to RELENG_6.
>
I'll keep that in mind for the future, thanks.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?444576D0.5000603>