From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 3 10:41:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0C816A420 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:41:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from current@dino.sk) Received: from bsd.dino.sk (bsd.dino.sk [213.215.72.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE6343D45 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:41:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from current@dino.sk) Received: from [172.16.39.201] ([213.215.72.45]) by bsd.dino.sk with esmtp; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 11:43:52 +0100 id 00000679.44081DE8.0000F6CE From: Milan Obuch To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 11:42:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20060303120227.I86586@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> In-Reply-To: <20060303120227.I86586@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603031142.51384.current@dino.sk> Subject: Re: Dell D810/FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE/interrupts?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:41:46 -0000 On Friday 03 March 2006 11:19, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > Hello! > > On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Anthony Maher wrote: > > In /etc/rc.conf, commenting out the following solved the problems. > > > > ###performance_cx_lowest="LOW" > > ###economy_cx_lowest="LOW" > > > > sorry for the noise. > > It's not a noise, it's a real problem. My ASUS M5A notebook (Intel > Pentium M CPU model 750 1.86GHz), usually quite fast machine, becomes > dead slow if I leave now-default settings *_cx_lowest="LOW". Every > keystroke takes almost second to get echo on idle machine. I understand, > ACPI developers want to test non-C1 cx states, that's why default > settings have changed. But with this level of performance everybody will > just switch back to C1. > Could you eventually try another Cx state? I have similar trouble with VIA Samuel based system, available states are C1, C2 and C3. LOW means C3, but this is terribly slow and unusable, in effect. C2, set via sysctl works well. I think ACPI developers would like to know our experiences. Regards, Milan