Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 16:48:08 +0200 From: Mark Huizer <freebsd+current@dohd.org> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0: device timeout Message-ID: <20050508144808.GA12603@eeyore.local.dohd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050504221204.GA89077@eeyore.local.dohd.org> References: <20050425183733.GB24146@eeyore.local.dohd.org> <2323.216.177.243.38.1114457612.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <20050425200052.GC24146@eeyore.local.dohd.org> <200504262133.42669.saturn@serv.net> <20050427131441.GB98718@over-yonder.net> <20050504221204.GA89077@eeyore.local.dohd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 12:12:04AM +0200, Mark Huizer wrote: > > > uname -a > > > FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sat Apr 23 19:52:42 UTC 2005 > > > the kernel is the amd64 and I am running and amd64 processor > > > > I've also seen a couple (not many, but this is a low-traffic system > > anyway) lately, which is unusual. > > > > FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Sat Jan 29 00:29:15 CST 2005 > > > Any info on the specific cards? (dmesg info would be nice?) > Perhaps these are all the same type of cards? > > fxp0: <Intel 82558 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xe000-0xe01f mem 0xe3000000-0xe30fffff,0xe3101000-0xe3101fff irq 5 at device 17.0 on pci0 > miibus1: <MII bus> on fxp0 fxp0: <Intel 82550 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xe000-0xe03f mem 0xe3000000-0xe301ffff,0xe3021000-0xe3021fff irq 5 at device 17.0 on pci0 miibus1: <MII bus> on fxp0 fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:02:b3:48:51:43 fxp0: device timeout fxp0: Microcode loaded, int_delay: 1000 usec bundle_max: 6 Changed it with another card, still the same problem. What could possible make the difference between -current and -stable? Mark -- Nice testing in little China...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050508144808.GA12603>