From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Apr 5 10:30:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from server.baldwin.cx (jobaldwi.campus.vt.edu [198.82.67.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BCB537B861 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 10:30:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from john.baldwin.cx (john [10.0.0.2]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02597; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 13:30:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200004051730.NAA02597@server.baldwin.cx> X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200004050718.BAA77123@harmony.village.org> Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 13:30:00 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: How stable is the ATA code? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, lioux@uol.com.br Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 05-Apr-00 Warner Losh wrote: > In message <200004050712.BAA77034@harmony.village.org> Warner Losh writes: >: Apollo 82c586B (aka MPV3). > > I have reason to believe that the statement above is inaccurate. I'm > confusing two problem children at the moment. I have the motherboard mentioned (FIC 503+ or whatever it's called) with the following Apollo chips on-board currently running 3.4: chip0: rev 0x04 on pci0.0.0 chip1: rev 0x00 on pci0.1.0 chip2: rev 0x41 on pci0.7.0 ide_pci0: rev 0x06 on pci0.7.1 chip3: rev 0x10 on pci0.7.3 Perhaps the 82C586x is the problem child? Note that the -B chip is the power management chip. :) > Warner -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jobaldwi/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message