Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:14:20 +0100
From:      Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>
Subject:   Re: Is port #12345 worth a new entry?
Message-ID:  <200502041114.31700.max@love2party.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050204110809.fh2of5sm8kkoco8g@netchild.homeip.net>
References:  <20050204110809.fh2of5sm8kkoco8g@netchild.homeip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1422252.u1WFJbNsk0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Friday 04 February 2005 11:08, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're near 12345 port entries in the index file. Will/should we make a ne=
ws
> entry out of this nice number of ports?

And what about 12288 (0x3000) ... the possibilities are infinite ...

=2D-=20
/"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier@freebsd.org
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier@EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News

--nextPart1422252.u1WFJbNsk0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCA0sHXyyEoT62BG0RAuUFAJ9kYYvx+H4Q2wsALpcOse/psqBVRACferP/
Q+R+yQYY0vRhuRLoL5mtRXM=
=NHtI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1422252.u1WFJbNsk0--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502041114.31700.max>